ENERGY
MANAGEMENT - BSEE February Issue
Trevor S Palmer, Managing Director at Sontay, examines the role
that field and control peripheral devices can make in reducing
energy consumption.
Energy use in commercial and public buildings is under increasingly
intense scrutiny.
It is not only the moral responsibility of those of us in the
building services sector to do something about reducing fuel
consumption but it also a legal obligation under the EU Energy
Performance of Buildings Directive and, subsequently, Part L
of the Building Regulations as legislated within the UK during
the past few years.
This legislation obliges designers, building owners and facilities
management companies to integrate fuel and carbon reduction measures
in new build projects and during the refurbishment of existing
estates. They are also required to design into buildings the
capability to monitor, report and account for energy usage.
Applying these standards to new builds
demands the application of additional hardware peripherals.
Yet, within the scope of an overall project, these extra devices
will have very little impact on the total project cost of the
building’s system.
Existing buildings represent a much bigger
challenge. They account for 99% of the nation’s stock and for nearly 20% of all
carbon emissions, according to last year’s findings contained
in the All Party Urban Development Group’s Report, “Greening
UK Cities’ Buildings”. Retrofitting energy reduction
technologies here is an entirely different proposition. Material,
and in particular, installation costs are heavily impacted, making
them a costly proposition and, as a result, bringing a much longer
return on the initial capital investment made.
The recent introduction onto the market of a new breed of control
products is helping to cut installation costs for these newly
required systems. These new devices are especially relevant in
reducing refurbishment costs in the existing buildings market
since the majority are based on wireless technologies, such as
mesh and self healing tree type networking. These offer much
more reliable performance compared to the point to point systems
currently on the market.
In the past, what would have required hard wiring to and from
the out-station control panels, sensors and other peripheral
monitoring equipment can now be replaced with wireless communication.
This transition is not unlike the evolution we have seen in wireless
computer networks.
Wireless sensing products, in particular,
offer numerous advantages from a facility management and “life of building” perspective.
Wired sensors are typically located in areas of the space which
help make installation easier rather than fulfilling what should
surely be their primary focus - to optimise monitoring, energy
usage and occupant comfort. Wired sensors and interconnecting
wiring are also rarely recovered and re-utilized during any renovation
or refurbishment as a building occupants requirements change.
Wireless sensors can offer the facilities
manager the flexibility within a building to adapt to the changing
circumstances of the occupants without the need for major re-wires
and disruption to the building operation. These wireless products
can also be located once the structure is completed, thereby
eliminating the risk of damaged sensor housings and wiring
during the building construction process. Location of the sensors
can then be determined by the requirements of the building
user at a much later time, with the occupant optimising energy
usage, space and comfort. These products can be easily re-used
and relocated during building refurbishments to suit an occupant’s
latest needs, offering a much more sustainable approach whilst
reducing the future cost of system refits.
Another area where sensing devices can help reduce energy usage
centres on the difference between Air Quality and Carbon Dioxide
sensors. Many installers often use Air Quality sensors to control
occupancy demand ventilation and fresh air input to a building.
However, these sensors typically only sense Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOCs). The use of this type of sensor for fresh air
demand control can result in excessive amounts of fresh air being
introduced into the building. The enthalpy of this air can considerably
increase energy demands as it requires conditioning it to meet
the occupancy conditions specified within a building.
In contrast, Carbon Dioxide sensors are seen as a more accurate
way of controlling fresh air demand in a building based on occupancy.
This device is particularly important to ensure the accurate
measurement of Carbon Dioxide levels within a room or building
which, if too high, will create a stuffy, unproductive working
environment and drowsiness. Measuring Carbon Dioxide content
is a key requirement in the multi-billion pound Building School
for the Future programme currently underway in the UK. In fact,
In fact, as part of this programme, Building Bulletin 101 actually
specifies limiting CO2 levels within teaching and learning spaces
to 1500 parts per million. So, it almost goes without saying
that specifying the right sensor is a critical first step in
delivering on this objective.
Metering is another area of the BMS market which has literally
exploded in sales volume in recent years as a result of the new
energy legislation. Facilities are now required to monitor energy
usage intervals, and together with the large increase in domestic
apartment blocks with centralised domestic hot water, central
heating systems.
This has led to a significant increase in demand for heat and
energy meters in the buildings control market. As a result, metering
and sub-metering equipment is now a key part of the building
peripherals eco system.
The installation of this type of equipment requires both mechanical
and electrical trades to become involved and work effectively
together.
Costs involved can have an adverse affect on first project cost
(especially billing software). So, it is important to consider
when choosing products that specifications and quality are examined
and closely compared, rather than simply to look at the bottom
line cost. Often what appear to be competitively priced products
can have a high overall system life cost. For example, low reliability
and repeatability can lead to costly service visits and downtime
if heating systems need to be drained to enable a repair. The
result in such cases will be unhappy clients and also high energy
usage if products with poor accuracy are used to control building
parameters.
Buildings are responsible for generating significant CO2 emissions.
Much of this CO2 is generated by energy hungry and sometimes
inefficient building services. As an industry we are well placed
to act. Control peripheral technologies certainly exist which
will enable us to make a difference now and in the future. With
equipment correctly selected and specified, we can meet the legislative
challenges and help deliver low carbon buildings on new build
and refurbishment projects today.
If there are any features you would like to see included
or changed on our site, please let us know
via our online feedback form.
|